|
Vaccination - Safe or Dangerous?
It is widely thought in the medical profession that
infections and many diseases are mainly / partly caused
by viruses or bacteria.
In a healthy body, these bacteria are identified by
our immune system that will proceed to manufacture antibodies
to render them harmless. Should our immune system be
deficient in any way because of bad eating habits, negative
emotions / stress or a toxic environment, then these
bacteria will either not be picked up by our immune
cells or an insufficient amount of antibodies will be
generated and disease will develop.
Should the immune system be strong, then we will generate
a sufficient amount of antibodies and after suffering
some symptoms, we should regain health.
For example, fever and red blotches could indicate
that we have contacted measles. Once our body has identified
the disease and generated a sufficient amount of antibodies,
we recover.
Furthermore, our body will keep a copy of the virus
and should it be exposed to the same virus again, it
will quickly respond by manufacturing the required antibodies
and the disease will not get a chance to manifest. Clever
isn't it?
This is called acquired immunity
Artificial immunity
A vaccine is a preparation of viral or bacterial particles
that will mimic the viruses or bacteria responsible
for a disease. It is chemically prepared in a much reduced
potency in order to (supposedly) be safe to inject in
the body. The theory is that once present in the body,
the vaccine will provide artificial immunity and not
have the harmful effect of the disease itself. Good
in theory wouldn't you agree?
According to pharmaceutical companies vaccination is:
* The main reason for the decline of infectious conditions
* The only effective method of eliminating dangerous
infectious conditions
* Harmless when compared to the disease itself
Two snags though:
If the preparation is not diluted enough (or sufficiently
modified), it may generate the disease it is supposed
to prevent in a potentially more virulent form.
If the preparation is too diluted or altered too much,
then the disease may not be recognised and the vaccination
process will have been a complete (and potentially dangerous)
waste of time.
The germ theory accepted by the medical profession
is that of Louis Pasteur. Whereby a disease is introduced
into a body externally.
Antoine Deschamp who inspired Louis Pasteur into this
theory however demonstrated that viruses and bacteria
were already present in normal cells although the body
was not suffering from any disease.
This has been picked up by many Alternative thinkers
who believe, as I do, that the body must first get itself
into a weak state (immune deficient) for any disease
to be able to develop.
Let me give you an example:
Imagine you are in a lift with 10 other people. One
of them has a very bad dose of flu and is sneezing happily.
The flu virus will spread around the enclosed lift.
Will all 10 people catch the flu?
Of course not. Maybe 2 or 3 will catch it because their
immune system is low. Possibly another couple may have
minor symptoms and the rest will have no symptoms whatsoever.
What is the difference between them? Is it because
some have been immunised and others not? Of course not.
The difference is the strength of their immune system.
Have vaccinations helped curb disease?
Governments, pushed by pharmaceutical companies, are
keen to publish statistics that show how effective vaccination
has been. For example, they proudly show the eradication
of tuberculosis (now coming back strongly), smallpox,
typhus and typhoid between 1950 and the late 1960s.
Death from these in 1950 were 1,000 per million of population.
What they forget to show us in what was happening BEFORE
the introduction of vaccination.
Between the years 1860 and 1950 cases of the above
disease had dropped from 6,000 per million of population
to just under 1,000 per million and were well on their
way out. A drop of nearly 85% achieved without any vaccination.
This was due to the progress made in sanitation, hygiene
etc.. (statistics from a report presented at the "Presidential
address of the British Association for the advancement
of sciences" By Porter in 1971).
Does vaccination work?
To this day, a vaccine is considered successful if
the body generates antibodies as a result of the vaccination.
But is it effective?
The Salk Polio vaccine was introduced in 1955. Despite
this, the American government claimed that the 61% decrease
in polio cases in 1954 was due to the vaccine!!! (ref:
Dr Bernard Greenberg, Head of the Department of Biostatistics
of the University of North Carolina). Dr Greenberg also
stated that there was an increase of 50% in 1957-8 and
80% in 1958-9 AFTER the introduction of the mass immunisation
program. Not too impressive would you say.
The very controversial triple vaccine against Measles,
Mumps and Rubella (MMR)has been available since 1975.
The What Doctors Don't Tell You publication however
states that between 1983 and 1990, there has been a
423% increase in the number of Measles cases. Furthermore,
the American government reported that 80% of the new
cases of Measles had been from vaccinated people! (statistics
from the Centre for Disease Control Morbidity and Mortality
Weekly Report from 6 June 1986). On 26 March 1987, the
New England Journal of Medicine reported that in 1986
in Corpus Chisti, Texas, there was an epidemic of Measles
and that 99% of the children affected had been vaccinated
against Measles!!! Do we call this effective or what?
Children who have been vaccinated with MMR can still
develop the disease, but in a much stronger form that
can include liver abnormalities, pneumonia and arthritis
(W James quoted in "Mass Immunisation" by
Trevor Gunn).
Can a vaccine cause harm?
A vaccine is injected directly into the bloodstream.
Our natural system of defence such as the skin and liver
are bypassed by this process. Paralysis, brain damage
and Autism have been linked to vaccinations. Doctors
who inject vaccines are aware that on occasion, a person
will collapse and may die or develop serious respiratory
problems. They are train to cope with this eventuality.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) was shown by Dr
William Torch of the Nevada school of medicine to be
directly related to the vaccination of children when
two third of the children who died from SIDS had been
injected with D.T.P. (Diphteria, Pertussin and Tetanus).
A.I.D.S. (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome), is
interestingly more prominent in the seven African states
that have been most vaccinated for smallpox! Is this
a coincidence?
In the UK, doctors are given bonuses when they achieve
the highest percentage of vaccinations. This financial
incentive ensures that vaccination is not going to be
challenged by many.
Author: Patrick Hamouy
Patrick Hamouy teaches Reiki Healing, Indian Head Massage,
Emotional Freedom Therapy (EFT), Anatomy & Physiology,
Oriental Diagnosis & Psychic Development. He sees
customers for consultations.in Macrobiotic, Emotional
Freedom Therapy (EFT) and Removal of toxic products
from the home environment Full information on his web
site at: http://www.therapies.com
Keywords :Vaccination, immunisation, mmr, diphtheria,
tetanus, pertussin, aids, sudden death, vaccine, immune
system, Measles, Mumps, Rubella, tuberculosis, smallpox,
typhus, typhoid, flu vaccine, disease, illness, germs,
Pasteur, Antoine Deschamp, immunity, virus, bacteria,
antibodies
Content Provided By : SubmitYOURArticle.com
|